Programs that Use Animal Testing
The
DDAL lobbies to influence policy in two of the major chemical
testing programs in the United States: the High Production Volume
Chemical Testing Program and the Endocrine Disruptor Screening
Program. Both programs are sponsored by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
The High Production Volume (HPV)
Chemical Testing
Program obtains basic screening data on the
approximately 2,800 chemicals produced or imported into the
United States in quantities of one million pounds or more each
year.
The Endocrine Disruptor Screening
Program (EDSP) is currently slated to evaluate
the potential harmful effects chemicals have on the endocrine
systems of people and wildlife. In their initial plan, the EPA
planned to use hundreds of thousands of animals in painful and
often lethal tests for literally thousands of chemicals.
Why the HPV Program Began
The HPV program is a voluntary effort to
obtain screening toxicity data on approximately 2,800 of the
most widely used chemicals. To be included in the program a
chemical must be manufactured in, or imported into, the United
States in quantities of one million pounds or more each year.
Originally conceived in response to a perceived lack of basic
toxicity data for these chemicals, the program is sponsored
by the Environmental Defense, the American Chemistry Council
and the Environmental Protection Agency.
The HPV program calls for a checklist, known as a complete
Screening Information Data Sheet, of mostly animal-based toxicity
tests developed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD). Unfortunately, the EPA’s checklist
did not allow for non-animal or alternative tests like the OECD
version.
How Animal Lives Can be Saved
Animal protection organizations worked hard to ensure animal
welfare was a priority in the HPV program. We hoped to replace
the emphasis on new animal testing, which meant harming
and killing animals, with an emphasis on collecting pre-existing
data. DDAL lobbied Congress to weigh-in with the EPA Administrator
and various members of the Clinton Administration.
In addition, we secured hearings before the House Science Committee
Subcommittee on the HPV Program. With other leading members
of the animal protection community, we negotiated the “October
14, 1999 Agreement” which may save as many as 800,000
animals.